Study Details How U.S. Could Cut 28% of Greenhouse Gases

Published: November 30, 2007, NY Times

The report said the country was brimming with “negative cost opportunities” — potential changes in the lighting, heating and cooling of buildings, for example, that would reduce carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of fossil fuels even as they save money. “These types of savings have been around for 20 years,” said Jack Stephenson, a director of the study. But he said they still face tremendous barriers.

Read more....


Anonymous said…
What I don't understand is why we aren't doing anything about this? There are so many things that we could do to cut greenhouse gases that would be effective and cost efficient. Even the littlest things would help. The whole global warming thing is obviously a porblem, seeing as how so many people are concerned about it, and yet we still do nothing to begin to reverse the problem we have caused? Even though reducing greenhouse gases is a very small step in a very long process it still is something. It shows that we as humans care about what is happening and that we are willing to take responsibility for the actions we've made to put the world in the position it's in now..
Anonymous said…
Nice article. I hope our President-Elect lives up to his campaign promises and really take the time to address our climate issues.

Popular posts from this blog

Why the era of cheap food is over

Starting An Extended Waterfast

Climate Confusion: Who Wins?